Chapter Thirteen. Prosecution and interrogation of an accused

12.10.1999. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-300/1999 The court cannot make a lawful and reasoned judgment if the prosecution decision contains serious deficiencies and does not meet the requirements of Article 146 of the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code

28.09.1999. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-252/1999 Pursuant to the provisions of Article 146 of the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code, the wording of the accusation must be precise, specific and understandable

24.11.1998. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-365/1998 Judgments of the courts of first instance and appellate courts are quashed by referral of the case to the prosecutor because the decision to prosecute the accused under Article 161.2 of the Latvian Criminal Code does not comply with the requirements of Article 146 of the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code

25.08.1998. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-276/1998 The judgment has been set aside and the case has been referred for further pre-trial investigation for violation of Articles 19 and 146 of the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code

16.12.1997. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-348/1997 Judgments of the courts of first and appellate instance have been annulled by referring the case to the prosecutor for pre-trial investigation, because the decision to prosecute the accused under Section 103 of the Latvian Criminal Code does not meet the requirements of Section 146 of the Latvian Criminal Procedure Code

28.05.1996. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-115/1996 On the direct conformity and consistency of the descriptive part of the indictment with the accusation presented to the accused