2022.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-[D]/2022
Possibility of confiscation of the apartment owned by the accused when imposing additional punishment – confiscation of property
14.09.2021.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-583/2021
Restriction in agreement proceedings to impose the additional punishment – restriction of rights – which has not been provided for in the sanction of the relevant Section of the Special part of the Criminal Law; A description of a criminal offence – significant part of a judgment of conviction
08.06.2021.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-J-88/2021
Imposition of confiscation of property; Realisation of fair regulation in the case of a newly disclosed circumstance
16.02.2021.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-15/2021
Modification of an accusation in the appellate instance court due to a change in the factual circumstances of the criminal offence without any changes in the qualification of the offence; Additional punishment provided for in the sanction of Paragraph two of Section 218 of the Criminal Law – deprivation of the right to a certain or all type of commercial activity or to a specific employment, or the right to hold a certain position
12.10.2017.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-J-671/2017
Imposition of an additional punishment – restriction of rights – which is not foreseen in the sanction of the Article of the Special Part of the Criminal Law
20.01.2017.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-J-44/2017
Person disabled from working; revocation of a judgment by which an agreement entered into during pre-trial proceedings has been approved
20.05.2016.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-207/2016
Conditions for suspension or splitting of the deadline for payment of a fine
23.05.2013.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Senate, case No SKK-306/2013
Confiscation of property as segregation of punishment from special confiscation stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Law
18.06.2012.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Senate, case No SKK-314/2012
Authority of a court of appellate instance in determination of amount of a fine
19.06.2012.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Senate, case No SKK-234/2012
Segregation of confiscation of proceeds from crime from confiscation of property as punishment
26.01.2012.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Senate, case No SKK-50/2012
Fine is to be determined in amount of minimum monthly wages established in the Republic of Latvia
24.03.2011.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Senate, case No SKK-111/2011
The Paragraph Four Section 45 of the Criminal Law is not applicable, if a criminal misdemeanour is committed
28.01.2011.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Senate, case No SKK-20/2011
Deprivation of a right to drive a vehicle as a prohibition to drive a vehicle for a term established by a court
21.12.2010.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Senate, case No SKK-597/2010
Moment of commencement of serving an additional punishment – restriction of rights
05.11.2010.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Senate, case No SKK-508/2010
Compensation of harm, set by a court, is not considered to be punishment in understanding of the Section 35 of the Criminal Law or double jeopardy in understanding of the Section 25 of the Criminal Procedure Law
05.10.2010.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Senate, case No SKK-J-428/2010
Serving of an additional punishment – deprivation of right to drive a vehicle, if a person has committed a new offence
06.07.2010.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Senate, case No SKK-334/2010
Remand of a person and serving deprivation of liberty are two different legal situations of a person
27.04.2010.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Senate, case No SKK-214/2010
Incorporation of a part of a punishment, which was not served – namely, police control, to punishment for a new offence
18.01.2010.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Senate, case No SKK-J-45/2010
Conditions of replacement of additional punishment – police control
27.11.2008.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Senate, case No SKK-637/2008
Property, to which commercial pledge is registered, can also be confiscated
08.11.2007.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Senate, case No SKK-J-571/2007
An incapacitated person within the meaning of Section 40 of the Criminal Law
27.03.2006.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Senate, case No SKK-130/2006
Serving of additional punishment and determination of punishment by several judgments
07.02.2005.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Senate, case No SKK-104/2005
Police control as an additional punishment may not be applied to a convicted person, who is adjudged deprivation of liberty by suspended sentence
17.02.2004.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Senate, case No SKK-73/2004
Judgement is quashed due to non-observance of conditions of the Paragraph Two Section 46 and the Paragraph One Section 42 of the Criminal Law
04.12.2000.
Assignment Hearing Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-357/2000
According to Article 45 of the Criminal Law, police supervision is an ancillary penalty imposed by a court on a person sentenced to a real custodial sentence. An additional penalty - police supervision - cannot be imposed when imposing a suspended sentence
02.03.2000.
Assignment Hearing Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-57/2000
An additional penalty - police supervision - can be imposed by a court if a person is sentenced to a real custodial sentence, but this ancillary penalty cannot be imposed if the deprivation of liberty is conditional
22.12.1999.
Assignment Hearing Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK- 368/1999
When classifying offenses and imposing penalties only in accordance with the Articles of the Special Part of the Latvian Criminal Code, the provisions of the General Part of the Criminal Code, and not those of the Criminal Law, shall apply
05.10.1999.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-296/1999
The unjustified application of the provisions of Article 43 of the Criminal Law
15.06.1999.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK- 203/1999
By law, police control can only be imposed as an additional penalty on persons convicted of a real custodial sentence
15.06.1999.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-183/1999
When imposing an additional penalty, the court must comply with the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 44 of the Criminal Law
10.02.1997.
Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases, case No SKK-46/1998
If the sanction of a particular article of the Criminal Law does not provide for an additional penalty, the judgment shall refer to the relevant article of the General Part of the Criminal Law (Section 27 of the Latvian Criminal Code, Section 44 of the Criminal Law)
