NATURALIZATION, GRANTING OF CITIZENSHIP, GRANTING OF RESIDENCE PERMITS, INCLUSION OF NON-RESIDENTS IN THE LIST OF PERSONS PROHIBITED FROM ENTRY IN THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA
30.04.2021.
Judgment of the Department of Administrative Cases, case No SKA-424/2021
“Humanitarian considerations” as a ground for the granting of a residence permit in exceptional cases
02.11.2021.
Judgment of the Department of Administrative Cases, case No SA-3/2021
Assessment of the proportionality of the entry ban applied to the person and restrictions of rights deriving from it in the relation with the protection of national security interests
16.07.2021.
Judgment of the Department of Administrative Cases, case No SA-1/2021
Rights of lawyer to access the case files containing state secret and limitation of these rights
31.08.2020.
Decision on Ancillary Complain of the Department of Administrative Cases, case No SKA-1263/2020
State’s obligation to take into account the aspect of human rights when deciding on expulsion of a foreigner
06.02.2019.
Judgment of the Department of Administrative Cases, case No SKA-328/2019
Interpretation of the criterion „poses a threat to the safety of the Latvian state and the society” in relation to obtaining citizenship in naturalization procedure
24.07.2018.
Judgment of the Department of Administrative Cases, case No SKA-268/2018
Application of Section 2, Paragraph one, Clause 2 of the Citizenship Law to those born during the occupation of Latvia
22.06.2018.
Judgment of the Department of Administrative Cases, case No SKA-237/2018
The rules of Citizenship law should be applied according to the doctrine of continuity of the state of Latvia
27.11.2018.
Judgment of the Department of Administrative Cases, case No SKA-123/2018
Impact of the institution’s erroneous indication of the unaffordability of double citizenship on the renewal of Latvian citizenship; Application of the analogy
26.07.2018.
Judgment of the Department of Administrative Cases, case No SKA-28/2018
Interpretation of Article 8.1 of Citizenship Law (Citizenship of Latvian Exiles and of Their Descendants)
26.04.2018.
Judgment of the Department of Administrative Cases, case No SKA-27/2018
Interpretation of first part of Section 8.1 of the Citizenship Law „due to referred reasons”
21.08.2017.
Judgment of the Department of Administrative Cases, case No SKA-196/2017
Legal nature of the right to resign from the status of a non-citizen of Latvia
06.05.2015.
Judgement of the Department of Administrative Cases, case No. SKA-241/2015
Obligation of the Office of Citizenship and Migration Affairs to provide indications and recommendations to an individual during procedure of requesting of temporary residence permit
14.03.2014.
Judgement of the Department of Administrative Cases, case No SKA-21/2014
Calculation of the term stipulated in Paragraph One Section 12 of the Citizenship Law
26.05.2009.
Decision of the Department of Administrative Cases of the Senate, case No SKA-493/2009
On internal decision of the Naturalization Department
08.03.2007.
Judgement of the Department of Administrative Cases of the Senate, case No SKA-89/2007
On application of principle of commensurateness, when issuing a mandatory administrative act
17.05.2007.
Judgement of the Department of Administrative Cases of the Senate, case No SKA-3/2007
Requirements stated for an individual asking for residence permit in relation to subsistence and notification about place of residence; application of a principle of commensurateness, when issuing and controlling a mandatory administrative act
11.04.2006.
Decision of the Department of Administrative Cases of the Senate, case No SKA-221/2006
The decision of the Cabinet of Ministers rejecting to take an individual to Latvian citizenship is a political decision and it may not be reversible in administrative procedure
07.02.2006.
Judgement of the Department of Administrative Cases of the Senate, case No SKA-39/2006
On legal standards to be applied in a case about cancellation of an administrative act with continuous impact; decision of the Office of Citizenship and Migration Affairs about deprivation of status of an alien as an administrative act with continuous impact
07.02.2006.
Judgement of the Department of Administrative Cases of the Senate, case No SKA-35/2006
On interpretation of Item 1 Paragraph One Section 7 and Item 3 Paragraph One Section 1 of the Aliens’ Law – on reason of deprivation of an alien’s status and circumstances to be assessed for adoption of that
24.02.2006.
Judgement of the Department of Administrative Cases of the Senate, case No SA-4/2006
On substantiation of a decision, including an individual in list of foreigners, who are prohibited to enter the Republic of Latvia, on circumstances to be assessed for acceptance of that and on its re-assessment in a court
26.04.2006.
Judgement of the Department of Administrative Cases of the Senate, case No SA-2/2006
On exception from terms of the Section 67 of the Administrative Procedure Law on components of an administrative act (“Case of Berezovskis”)
15.03.2005.
Judgement of the Department of Administrative Cases of the Senate, case No SKA-56/2005
On refusal of naturalization to persons, who chose the Republic of Latvia as their place of residence after the 17th of June, 1940, just after discharge from the USSR armed forces
08.03.2005.
Judgement of the Department of Administrative Cases of the Senate, case No SKA-46/2005
On intertemporal applicability of a legal standard, on circumstances, in which residence permit would become invalid, as well as on actual action and decisions of the Office of Citizenship and Migration Affairs as on administrative acts
26.10.2004.
Judgement of the Department of Administrative Cases of the Senate, case No SKA-177/2004
On human rights criteria to be assessed by a court, when performing control over an administrative act, in which it is decided not to issue residence permit to an individual
24.08.2004.
Judgement of the Department of Administrative Cases of the Senate, case No SKA-89/2004
deprivation of status on an alien is essential restriction of rights of an individual and it may not be grounded on formal reasons and facts, which were not clarified fully
